]
[Footnote 45: The conspiracy of Catiline was in B.C. 63, the year when
Cicero was consul. See the Life of Cicero.
There seems to be no evidence that Crassus was implicated in the
affair of Catiline. Dion Cassius (37. c. 31) speaks of anonymous
letters about the conspiracy being brought to Crassus and other
nobles; and Plutarch states on the authority of Cicero that Crassus
communicated the letters to Cicero. Dion Cassius in another passage
(37. c. 35) mentions the suspicion against Crassus, and that one of
the prisoners informed against him, "but there were not many to
believe it." If Dion did not believe it, we need not; for he generally
believes anything that is to a man's discredit. Sallustius (_Bellum
Catilin._ c. 48) has given us a statement of the affair, but his own
opinion can scarcely be collected from it. He says, however, that he
had heard Crassus declare that Cicero was the instigator of this
charge. The orations of Cicero which Plutarch refers to are not
extant.]
[Footnote 46: The text is corrupt, though the general meaning is
plain. See the note of Sintonis.]
[Footnote 47: The son of Crassus, who is introduced abruptly in
Plutarch's fashion.]
[Footnote 48: After Caesar had been praetor in Spain he was elected
consul B.C. 59, with M. Calpurnius Bibulus (see the Life of Caesar, c.
14). After his consulship Caesar had the Gauls as his province. The
meeting at Luca (Lucca), which was on the southern limits of Caesar's
province, took place B.
Pages:
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131